Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Ir Med J ; 115(2): 543, 2022 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1813005

ABSTRACT

Aims The expedited development of multiple COVID-19 vaccines has raised concerns for some, with vaccine hesitancy described in many populations. A U.S. study assessing fertility patients attitudes towards the COVID -19 vaccine revealed that over half were unsure, or would not accept the vaccine if offered. Only 7.4% of participants in this study were male. We therefore sought to assess the perspective of male fertility patients towards COVID-19 vaccination. Methods Men with a fertility appointment were invited to complete an anonymous 21-item questionnaire. Results Willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccination was influenced by stage of fertility journey. Overall, 76% (n=102) of participants were willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Men with a pregnant partner were most likely to accept or have already accepted the vaccine (97%, 30/31). Conclusion Although concerns around COVID-19 vaccines persist, this study demonstrates the growing rate of acceptance and engagement among the male fertility population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fertility , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
2.
Human Reproduction ; 36:466-466, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1357948
3.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ; 30(SUPPL 3):A116, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1177570

ABSTRACT

Introduction COVID-19 has had significant repercussions on the provision of oncological surgical services worldwide. Within any Gynaecological Oncology service, careful consideration needs to be given when weighing up peri-operative risks & potential inpatient exposure to COVID-19 versus the risk of delaying surgery. Often, for these patients, deferral of surgery may result in disease progression. Since March 2020, we identified 118 Gynaecological Oncology patients referred to the Ireland East Gynaecological Group between the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH) & St. Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH) for whom major oncological surgery was deemed clinically urgent. To minimise peri-operative morbidity and the risk of onward hospital transmission of COVID-19, screening questionnaires were administered before hospital admission. These screened for epidemiological risk, symptoms, recent travel & contacts. If asymptomatic, testing for SARS-CoV-2 was not performed. Methods We analysed the clinical data of the above 118 patients to determine their baseline characteristics/risk factors for COVID-19, suspected diagnoses, surgical procedures & 7- day morbidity. Results This cohort consisted of ovarian (n=57), endometrial (n=41), cervical (n=6) and vulvo-vaginal (n=14) cancer patients. 44% of cases were laparoscopic and 18% were major cytoreductive surgeries. All patients screened were deemed asymptomatic & low risk- therefore proceeded to surgery. 49 (41.5%) patients had a defined risk factor for COVID-19. 7- day post-operative morbidity was 13% (N=16). 3 patients met symptomatic criteria for COVID-19 testing post-operatively, however none tested positive. Conclusion Careful patient selection based on risk factors and symptoms allows units to continue to perform safe oncological surgery during a pandemic.

4.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ; 30:A116-A116, 2020.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1085868
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL